
The study aimed to compare the feasibility of vagino-hysteroscopy using an alginate gel interface (VAGI) with conventional vaginoscopic hysteroscopy (CVH). Thirty women undergoing diagnostic vagino-hysteroscopy were randomly allocated into Group I (VAGI) or Group II (CVH). The primary outcome was successful visualization of the uterine cavity, and secondary outcomes included operative time, hydrostatic pressures, pain experienced, maneuverability, and surgeon satisfaction. The study found that VAGI was significantly better than CVH, achieving successful visualization at lower pressures, less time, and using less irrigation fluid. The use of alginate gel is also patient-friendly and yields higher surgeon satisfaction rates.
Like
Save
Share