13Jun 2023
Comparing outcomes and cost-effectiveness of fertility preservation methods

Comparing outcomes and cost-effectiveness of fertility preservation methods

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of progestin‐primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone‐antagonist (GnRH‐A) protocol in fertility preservation (FP) in cancer patients. The stimulation option when patients were in the luteal phase was also explored. No significant differences were noted in the retrieved and vitrified oocytes/embryo numbers among the three groups. In the multiple regression model, age and antral follicle count (AFC), but not the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols, were associated with the number of retrieved oocytes. PPOS had similar clinical results but was superior medically and economically to GnRH‐A. For patients in the luteal phase, LPS was an optional protocol with similar outcomes and costs to PPOS.

  • #gynaecology - ivf

Like

Save

Share