
This study aims to analyze and compare data obtained globally from high-volume centres using disposable and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and see if, indeed, in real-world practice, either scope has a distinct advantage. A total of 6663 patients whose data were available for analysis were divided into Group 1 (Reusable scopes, 4808 patients) versus Group 2 (Disposable scopes, 1855 patients). The observations suggest that urologists choose disposable contents for more enormous, lower pole, and harder stones, and it does indeed help in improving the single-stage SFR if used correctly, with the appropriate lasers and lasing techniques in expert hands.
Like
Save
Share