
To assess the interfacial adaptation (gap‐containing areas) of two root canal sealers (EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus) to a conventional gutta‐percha (GP) cone (GP‐sealer interface) in oval‐shaped canals filled using the single cone technique. Gaps were non‐homogenously distributed in two‐dimensional axial cross‐section images and none of the specimens showed completely gap‐free areas along the entire GP‐sealer interface. Root canals filled with EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus displayed 171 (37.75%) and 136 (30.02%) slices with gaps in the GP‐sealer interface and these frequencies were statistically significant (P = 0.000). Although none of the specimens had a gap‐free along the entire GP‐sealer interface, oval canals filled with AH Plus showed fewer gaps than those filled with EndoSequence BC Sealer.
Like
Save
Share