
The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of newly introduced ozonated gels compared with conventional chlorhexidine gel in the home management of periodontal patients. A total of 30 patients with bilateral periodontal disease were enrolled in a split-mouth study design. After nonsurgical mechanical periodontal debridement, teeth were randomly divided into two groups: one treated with chlorhexidine-based gel (Control group) and the other with ozone-based gels (Test group). Follow-up assessments at 1, 2, and 6 months included clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque control record (PCR), recession (R), and tooth mobility (TM). Both ozone and chlorhexidine adjuncts were effective in periodontal treatment, suggesting ozone as a potential alternative to chlorhexidine.
Like
Save
Share