
We aimed to compare the shaping ability of a heat‐treated centric reciprocating file system (WaveOne Gold), a heat‐treated eccentric rotary multifile system (TRUShape 3D Conforming Files), and a heat‐treated expandable one‐file rotary system (XP‐endo Shaper) extending its activation time, in preparing oval‐shaped root canals in extracted mandibular molars by means of microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) analysis. The comparison of three recognized root canal filing systems has shown that with similar preparation times, the XP‐endo Shaper removed more dentine (mm3) leaving less unprepared canal wall area (%) than WaveOne Gold and TRUShape when preparing oval‐shaped root canals of extracted mandibular molars.
Like
Save
Share