
We aimed to determine whether author conflicts of interest and industry sponsorship influenced the nature of results and conclusions of systematic reviews focusing on treatment interventions for erectile dysfunction. Authors' conflicts of interest were collected from the systematic reviews' disclosure statements. Nine reviews contained at least one author with conflicts of interest; of which eight reported narrative results favoring the treatment group, and seven reported conclusions favoring the treatment group. Discussion The results and conclusions of systematic reviews for erectile dysfunction treatments did not appear to be influenced by authors who reported conflicts of interest. Conclusion Although we found that undisclosed conflicts of interest were problematic among systematic reviews of erectile dysfunction treatment...
Like
Save
Share