
The study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of selective root-canal retreatment compared to full retreatment in teeth with apical pathology. The study found that, in most scenarios, selective retreatment was both less costly and more effective than full retreatment. This cost-effectiveness held true across different willingness-to-pay thresholds. Only in a worst-case scenario did selective retreatment become more expensive but remained more effective. These findings suggest that, when clinically applicable, selective retreatment is likely to be a more cost-effective option for treating molars with persistent apical periodontitis. However, it's essential to consider the limited quality of the underlying data when interpreting these results.
Like
Save
Share