
This study evaluated the effect of the material thickness on shrinkage stress and bottom‐to‐top hardness ratio of conventional and bulk‐fill composites. Six commercial composites were selected based on their different technologies: Two conventional (C1, C2), two high‐viscosity bulk‐fill (HVB1, HVB2), and two low‐viscosity bulk‐fill (LVB1, LVB2). Shrinkage stress was analyzed for five specimens with 2 mm thickness (C‐factor 0.75 and volume 24 mm3) and five specimens with 4 mm thickness (C‐factor 0.375 and volume 48 mm3) for 300 s in a universal testing machine. Bottom‐to‐top hardness ratio values were obtained from Knoop microhardness measurements in specimens with 2‐ and 4‐mm thickness (n = 5)...
Like
Save
Share