
The present study aims to validate and compare four of the most widely used staging systems for juvenile angiofibroma in a homogeneous cohort of patients. A retrospective review of patients treated with endoscopic or endoscopic‐assisted surgical resection between 1999 and 2020 was carried out. All classification systems showed a similar association with blood loss, surgical time, the persistence of infection, and the need for transfusion. Involvement of the infratemporal fossa and intracranial extension was identified as red flags for surgical planning and preoperative counselling, as associated with increased risk for transfusion and persistent/recurrent disease, respectively. No classification system was better than the others in predicting the most important outcomes. Therefore, the most straightforward and most readily applicable approach would be the preferred one in clinical practice.
Like
Save
Share