.jpg?format=webp&width=780)
The study involved 3943 participants and found no variation in post-operative infection rates, complication rates, operative time, hospital stays, or stone-free rates between the two types. While single-use endoscopes exhibit a shorter operative time, their cost-efficiency and environmental impact depend on the institution's caseload and reprocessing facilities. This study assures urologists that their choice between 'use or reuse' can be made without compromising patient outcomes.
Like
Save
Share