
A life cycle assessment compared the carbon footprint of single-use (SU) and reusable (RU) gastroscopes for esogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). SU gastroscopes had a carbon footprint of 10.9 kg CO2 equivalent, significantly higher than the 4.7 kg CO2 equivalent for RU gastroscopes. SU gastroscopes also showed higher fossil fuel and water depletion. The study highlights the environmental impact of endoscope choice in medical settings.
Like
Save
Share