
To compare participant performance and preference in the use of three‐dimensional (3D) endoscopy compared to traditional two‐dimensional (2D) endoscopy. PubMed, Embase, Medline, ClinicalKey, BMJ Case Reports, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for English‐language articles published between 2005 and 2020. Studies reporting comparisons of outcomes between 3D and 2D endoscopes were identified. Data relating to performance‐related outcomes, as well as the participants' preferred endoscope were extracted, and pooled using meta‐analysis models. Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Six studies reported results of participants completing simulated tasks with endoscopes, while four reported full procedures. Peg transfer tasks (n = 4 cohorts) were found to be completed significantly faster with the 3D versus 2D endoscope...
Like
Save
Share