
The aim of this study was to report the results of five weight‐loss interventions in primary care settings in underserved patients and to compare the level of pragmatism across the interventions using the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS‐2) tool. Data from 54 primary care clinics (2,210 patients) were pooled from the Promoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary Care in Louisiana (PROPEL) and Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (REPOWER) cluster‐randomized trials. Clinics were randomized to one of five comparators: PROPEL usual care, PROPEL combination of in‐clinic and telephone visits, REPOWER in‐clinic individual visits, REPOWER in‐clinic group visits, or REPOWER telephone group visits...
Like
Save
Share